anthropic
pypi package · declared by 80 of 2,343 sampled repositories · graph computed 2026-08-24
Counted from the runtime dependencies public repositories declare — not the resolved tree. A transitive dependency is a consequence; a declared one is a choice. Development dependencies are excluded because they repeat across every project in a language regardless of what is being built.
Declared with
ranked by association, not by count| Declared with | Repositories | vs chance |
|---|---|---|
| google-generativeai | 10 of 2,343 | 0.60 |
| google-genai | 15 of 2,343 | 0.55 |
| openai | 46 of 2,343 | 0.54 |
| tiktoken | 20 of 2,343 | 0.45 |
| python-dotenv | 32 of 2,343 | 0.38 |
| pydantic | 37 of 2,343 | 0.33 |
| pyyaml | 27 of 2,343 | 0.32 |
| aiohttp | 12 of 2,343 | 0.31 |
| mcp | 14 of 2,343 | 0.30 |
| pydantic-settings | 14 of 2,343 | 0.30 |
| websockets | 8 of 2,343 | 0.28 |
| pillow | 16 of 2,343 | 0.28 |
| httpx | 22 of 2,343 | 0.28 |
| pandas | 16 of 2,343 | 0.25 |
| rich | 17 of 2,343 | 0.25 |
| requests | 22 of 2,343 | 0.23 |
| transformers | 12 of 2,343 | 0.23 |
| fastapi | 17 of 2,343 | 0.19 |
| uvicorn | 15 of 2,343 | 0.18 |
| torch | 9 of 2,343 | 0.16 |
Every pair above is counted from the same evidence: repo manifest.
Used instead
candidates · shares a neighbourhood and refuses to co-occurNo alternative measured. A pair qualifies only if it shares a neighbourhood and then fails to appear together against an expectation that it would — and almost everything that shares a neighbourhood does appear together. That is the test working, not a gap in the data: similarity alone would list this tool’s closest neighbours as alternatives, and most of them are things it is used with.