litellm

pypi package · declared by 78 of 2,343 sampled repositories · graph computed 2026-08-24

Counted from the runtime dependencies public repositories declare — not the resolved tree. A transitive dependency is a consequence; a declared one is a choice. Development dependencies are excluded because they repeat across every project in a language regardless of what is being built.

Declared with

ranked by association, not by count
Tools declared alongside this one, ranked by association strength
Declared withRepositoriesvs chance
tenacity17 of 2,3430.47
jinja216 of 2,3430.39
networkx9 of 2,3430.38
openai28 of 2,3430.38
pydantic38 of 2,3430.35
python-dotenv28 of 2,3430.35
tiktoken13 of 2,3430.34
pyyaml25 of 2,3430.31
pydantic-settings13 of 2,3430.30
typer12 of 2,3430.29
rich19 of 2,3430.29
datasets9 of 2,3430.29
loguru8 of 2,3430.28
pandas17 of 2,3430.28
uvicorn20 of 2,3430.26
httpx18 of 2,3430.24
mcp10 of 2,3430.24
click10 of 2,3430.23
requests21 of 2,3430.23
numpy23 of 2,3430.23

Every pair above is counted from the same evidence: repo manifest.

Used instead

candidates · shares a neighbourhood and refuses to co-occur

No alternative measured. A pair qualifies only if it shares a neighbourhood and then fails to appear together against an expectation that it would — and almost everything that shares a neighbourhood does appear together. That is the test working, not a gap in the data: similarity alone would list this tool’s closest neighbours as alternatives, and most of them are things it is used with.