matplotlib
pypi package · declared by 128 of 2,343 sampled repositories · graph computed 2026-08-24
Counted from the runtime dependencies public repositories declare — not the resolved tree. A transitive dependency is a consequence; a declared one is a choice. Development dependencies are excluded because they repeat across every project in a language regardless of what is being built.
Declared with
ranked by association, not by count| Declared with | Repositories | vs chance |
|---|---|---|
| scipy | 42 of 2,343 | 0.58 |
| seaborn | 15 of 2,343 | 0.57 |
| pandas | 59 of 2,343 | 0.56 |
| jupyter | 10 of 2,343 | 0.56 |
| scikit-learn | 34 of 2,343 | 0.52 |
| statsmodels | 8 of 2,343 | 0.48 |
| torch | 40 of 2,343 | 0.46 |
| torchvision | 21 of 2,343 | 0.46 |
| scikit-image | 8 of 2,343 | 0.46 |
| hydra-core | 8 of 2,343 | 0.46 |
| numpy | 67 of 2,343 | 0.45 |
| tensorboard | 9 of 2,343 | 0.41 |
| opencv-python | 14 of 2,343 | 0.40 |
| tqdm | 36 of 2,343 | 0.39 |
| datasets | 20 of 2,343 | 0.39 |
| accelerate | 19 of 2,343 | 0.38 |
| transformers | 29 of 2,343 | 0.36 |
| wandb | 10 of 2,343 | 0.36 |
| librosa | 8 of 2,343 | 0.36 |
| peft | 10 of 2,343 | 0.34 |
Every pair above is counted from the same evidence: repo manifest.
Used instead
candidates · shares a neighbourhood and refuses to co-occurNo alternative measured. A pair qualifies only if it shares a neighbourhood and then fails to appear together against an expectation that it would — and almost everything that shares a neighbourhood does appear together. That is the test working, not a gap in the data: similarity alone would list this tool’s closest neighbours as alternatives, and most of them are things it is used with.