scipy
pypi package · declared by 131 of 2,343 sampled repositories · graph computed 2026-08-24
Counted from the runtime dependencies public repositories declare — not the resolved tree. A transitive dependency is a consequence; a declared one is a choice. Development dependencies are excluded because they repeat across every project in a language regardless of what is being built.
Declared with
ranked by association, not by count| Declared with | Repositories | vs chance |
|---|---|---|
| matplotlib | 42 of 2,343 | 0.58 |
| statsmodels | 10 of 2,343 | 0.55 |
| scikit-learn | 35 of 2,343 | 0.54 |
| numpy | 76 of 2,343 | 0.52 |
| imageio | 9 of 2,343 | 0.50 |
| pandas | 46 of 2,343 | 0.48 |
| scikit-image | 8 of 2,343 | 0.47 |
| einops | 18 of 2,343 | 0.45 |
| tqdm | 40 of 2,343 | 0.44 |
| seaborn | 9 of 2,343 | 0.43 |
| av | 8 of 2,343 | 0.42 |
| torch | 33 of 2,343 | 0.41 |
| opencv-python | 13 of 2,343 | 0.39 |
| librosa | 8 of 2,343 | 0.37 |
| torchvision | 15 of 2,343 | 0.37 |
| huggingface-hub | 19 of 2,343 | 0.37 |
| safetensors | 9 of 2,343 | 0.36 |
| transformers | 27 of 2,343 | 0.36 |
| nltk | 9 of 2,343 | 0.34 |
| accelerate | 16 of 2,343 | 0.34 |
Every pair above is counted from the same evidence: repo manifest.
Used instead
candidates · shares a neighbourhood and refuses to co-occurNo alternative measured. A pair qualifies only if it shares a neighbourhood and then fails to appear together against an expectation that it would — and almost everything that shares a neighbourhood does appear together. That is the test working, not a gap in the data: similarity alone would list this tool’s closest neighbours as alternatives, and most of them are things it is used with.