redis
pypi package · declared by 66 of 2,343 sampled repositories · graph computed 2026-08-24
Counted from the runtime dependencies public repositories declare — not the resolved tree. A transitive dependency is a consequence; a declared one is a choice. Development dependencies are excluded because they repeat across every project in a language regardless of what is being built.
Declared with
ranked by association, not by count| Declared with | Repositories | vs chance |
|---|---|---|
| celery | 10 of 2,343 | 0.67 |
| asyncpg | 10 of 2,343 | 0.57 |
| alembic | 11 of 2,343 | 0.49 |
| pydantic-settings | 21 of 2,343 | 0.48 |
| pyjwt | 10 of 2,343 | 0.43 |
| sqlalchemy | 13 of 2,343 | 0.43 |
| fastapi | 31 of 2,343 | 0.42 |
| python-multipart | 15 of 2,343 | 0.40 |
| uvicorn | 26 of 2,343 | 0.39 |
| langchain-openai | 8 of 2,343 | 0.33 |
| loguru | 8 of 2,343 | 0.32 |
| pydantic | 26 of 2,343 | 0.29 |
| httpx | 18 of 2,343 | 0.29 |
| pillow | 12 of 2,343 | 0.27 |
| python-dotenv | 15 of 2,343 | 0.23 |
| openai | 13 of 2,343 | 0.22 |
| pandas | 10 of 2,343 | 0.20 |
| rich | 10 of 2,343 | 0.18 |
| pyyaml | 10 of 2,343 | 0.13 |
| requests | 11 of 2,343 | 0.13 |
Every pair above is counted from the same evidence: repo manifest.
Used instead
candidates · shares a neighbourhood and refuses to co-occurNo alternative measured. A pair qualifies only if it shares a neighbourhood and then fails to appear together against an expectation that it would — and almost everything that shares a neighbourhood does appear together. That is the test working, not a gap in the data: similarity alone would list this tool’s closest neighbours as alternatives, and most of them are things it is used with.